And your attitude re guns is the exact attitude that allowed Hitler to disarm Germany and then take over.



>>Just like Dylann Roof, this guy represents the most dangerous type of individual - a fool with a cause.
>
>It mystifies me that someone can say something like that and not realize how absurd it is that people like Dylan Roof and this man - fools with causes- or anyone for that matter can acquire guns so easily here in the US.
>
>We have a special section in the paper for shootings in Trenton. Several a day. Most aren't fatal, but now and then there is a fatality.
>Apparently the marksmanship in this area needs some tuning up.
>We don't have a section for axings, stranglings, poisonings, stabbings or clubbings with baseball bats, so shooting seems to be the method of choice for deadly attack, at least in Trenton.
>There's a gunshot wound section in the emergency room here. None that I saw for axings, stranglings, poisonings, stabbings or clubbings with baseball bats.
>I know some of the hospital administrators. They're P&L people first and last, so if that gunshot wound section wasn't busy enough to pay its way, they'd close it.
>
>
>The question, it seems to me, is "Should any civilian citizen of a civilized country be allowed to own a gun?" and the burden of proof should be on the person trying to answer that question in the affirmative.
>
>The reason we have more civilian gun wounds and deaths than the rest of the civilized world combined is that we have allowed ourselves to be snookered into asking that
question the wrong way.
>
>Think about what we did when we thought that some whackjob in Iraq might have "weapons of mass destruction."
>What else but a "weapon of mass destruction" is a gun in the hands of a Trenton teenager or some poor pyscho in South Carolina?