>>Reason #1: Because VFP developers needed *something* to moan about in the new release!
>
>I haven't upgraded yet to VFP6. But, at least, when time will come, I'll have plenty of documentation here by following those threads on the famous "well titled" C0000005 bug. :)

Has anyone else noticed that sometimes when VFP 5 creates a Dr. Watson, that the C0000005 address is given?

Someone mentioned earlier that they suspected that the source of this error is a result of the fox team's attempt to "internalize" many GPFs by making them VFP errors instead of Dr. Watson errors. I now think that this is probably true.