>>>>>
>>>>>Why is very simple. Because he's black and because you have members of congress that have said that no matter what Obama wants, they're not going to give it to him. Not like they care about the people...right?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Victor, there will always be a percentage of people who will strongly disagree with a political leader, no matter what.
>>>>And there will always be a percentage of people who will defend that leader, no matter what.
>>>>
>>>>Barack Obama won his first election in a landslide, and won the 2nd election by a significant margin.
>>>>
>>>>This "he's a certain color and therefore if you disagree, it must be because of his color" is disingenuous.
>>>
>>>Perhaps not his skin color, but I'm quite certain the blue vs red color has a lot to do with it. And that has everything to do with the huge polarization
>>>that has been going on for the last few decades.
>>
>>Sorry Walter, but that is such a broad generalization (and a misleading one) that it doesn't explain much.
>>
>>From my perspective, this administration set back race relations. He's nearly the reverse-MLK.

I disagree. Putting the racial problems, economic and social inequalities, problems with the justice system and disparities in prison sentences under the spotlight is not setting back race relations. If anything those that don't want these things brought up are the ones that are the everse-MLK.

>From where I stand, I see the same old arguments being made again and again, back and forth regardless of the president, but inline with the blue vs red color. It has become totally predictable.
>
>Though I must admit, that I'm curious how this is going to work out with trumph though.
>
>Walter,