>>>>>>CSV is a good example of standard ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>Your syntax is invalid, let me correct that:
>>>>>
>>>>>CSV is a good example of "standard"
>>>>>
>>>>>There.
>>>>
>>>>TsTs :P
>>>
>>>Thanks! I had this picture linked from my website, when it was in Ivan Krstić's blog (or whatever it was), then he closed it and the picture got lost. This is more of a miracle than I could imagine being possible - in my experience, you can find anything on the web except twice.
>>>
>>>OTOH, this is not applicable. I did mean the quotation marks in their usual sense, not for emphasis.
>>
>>In german the use is to mark a text expressed as spoken, not describing. What is your use?
>
>Usually mockery or to denote that the expression in quotes should not be taken literally. As in these two sentences:
>
>Windows is perfectly safe.
>Windows is "perfectly" safe.
>
>The other would be pronounced with the quoted word in an ironic, slightly accented, tone. Which is the reason I have asked several people here, how do they distinguish between the thing and the "thing" that they were talking about.
>
>It never occurred to me that quotes may be used for emphasis. It's like facing a bulgarian nod, you don't actually know what they mean.

I would consider your use as emphasis. Because you set a different meaning then one would expect. In spoken language one need to emphasis to do that?

Bulgarian nods are disturbing of the bulgarian acts like a non bulgarian. Short hesitation - nod. :)