>>>You mean the same Bernie that's leading in the polls?
>>>
>>>Victor, Victor, Victor. Are you ever going to grow up and start arguing intellectually instead of emotionally? It's not even worth arguing with you anymore because you are becoming more irrational as time goes by...
>>
>>Ya know he IS leading in two of the polls. If you have some sort of issue with me like that, may I suggest the fine twit feature that has been built into this forum for just this reason.
>
>Victor - Sanders is leading in New Hampshire (and there are rumblings that the Hillary campaign might just bag New Hampshire). However, latest polling Iowa shows Hillary with a slight lead. The Iowa polling has gone back and forth in the last month.
>
>Hillary still enjoys a large lead nationwide, and she is leading Sanders in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida. Any analyst will tell you that carrying the primary in all three of those states is significant.
>
>Certainly, Sanders is doing far better than expected. But it would take a catastrophic event (such as Hillary dropping out, being indicted, or some huge smoking gun) for her to lose to Sanders.

You also have to take into account that the republicans are going after Hillary pretty hard right now too - at moment she is a bigger target for them than Sanders. Considering that Sanders is a democratic socialist, I would think they republicans would be pouncing all over him...but as you said Hillary has all the numbers right now so that is where they're focusing their hate..errrr I mean attention. I think as time goes on his numbers will continue to climb as more people learn about him and more attacks happen on Hillary.