>>>>>>Hillary still enjoys a large lead nationwide, and she is leading Sanders in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida. Any analyst will tell you that carrying the primary in all three of those states is significant.
>>>>>
>>>>>FWIW, I can't remember the last time the PA primary mattered. In the general, sure, PA is important, but the primary is so late as to make it generally meaningless.
>>>>>
>>>>>Tamar
>>>>
>>>>In which U.S. city is the 2016 DNC convention being held?
>>>
>>>As Bill said, here in Philly. (We were supposed to have a trifecta in less than a year: the Pope, the Dalai Lama, and the DNC, but the Dalai Lama cancelled.)
>>>
>>>Answering what I assume is your question under that, as I said, PA is important in the general election. I can't remember the last time the Dems hadn't selected the candidate by the time of the PA primary, which is the last Tuesday in April. (In non-presidential years, it's the 3rd Tuesday in May.)
>>>
>>>Tamar
>>
>>Actually, I think the nomination was still in play in 2008 when the PA primary took place. It certainly was in NJ.
>
>I was volunteering for Obama by then, and I remember being disappointed about HIllary winning PA, but knowing that it wasn't going to matter.
>
>For example, this was from March 4, after the last set of primaries before PA: http://www.newsweek.com/hillarys-new-math-problem-83849
>
>Tamar

I rang doorbells for Obama during the primary and was happy to see him win NJ.
I rarely use the word "evil" but I think that the Clintons have earned that term.
If she gets the dem nod this time, unless the repubs nominate one of their crazies, I'll support the repub.