>>Depending on your devices, there are some wireless options already available e.g.
http://www.microsoft.com/surface/en-us/accessories/wireless-display-adapter>
>That sounds interesting.
>
>My monitor is HP Pavilion 27bw. It does not have the USB support. So, I guess once I change, I will need to check for that.
>
>My notebook is Sony Duo Pro 13. I have Windows 8.1. I am not sure if that part is ok.
This is emerging technology, you can get an overview of various options by Googling [wifi display adapter].
Here's another device from StarTech, which specializes in new/unusual connectivity options:
http://www.startech.com/AV/Extenders/HDMI/HDMI-Wireless-Display-Adapter-Miracast~WIFI2HDMCYou may want to look further into technologies such as Miracast and WiDi. I don't use them myself but I know they exist.
As for USB at your monitor, the wireless adapter is only using that as a power source. So you can plug it into a standard powered USB hub for that connector.
Cables are still better in many ways:
- Much simpler
- Higher bandwidth. I don't know if any wireless display technology can support 4K video yet
- Not subject to interference, lag/latency
- More secure if that's an issue
Regards. Al
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right." -- Isaac Asimov
Neither a despot, nor a doormat, be
Every app wants to be a database app when it grows up
