>How do you feel about Android snooping. There is no claim by Google that you can turn it off because you can't.
>
>>In addition to Als.
>>The great benefit from pro seams to be that you are not forced to any patch as soon as M$ throws them out. Nowadays the Home users are more or less beta testers for the pro users w/o any right. M$ even uses your bandwith to deploy M$ updates.
>>The good on Win10 is you need no AV anymore. Keylogger, Trojan horse and a Rootkit are build in anyway. Talks encrypted with home, so you have no chance to see what M$ knows about you.
>>Except for the patches M$ claims that you might turn it of, but I do not believe M$.

I will repeat this a last time
#0
My answers below are not woreshiping Google or android. They just point out the difference. I dislike Google as well.
Your arguments are not on a thechnical level nor are they related to my statements You do a distraction from the point by introducing the comparsion with google. This more the action of a believer, sock puppet or of a M$ spokesman. I think this will not show your community leadership.
#1
Android I have not paid for at the first place - so there need to be some revenue. M$ charges me for the OS
#2
Google use there services. I'm not forced to use them. I can set up my own server for calendar, mail etc. runing my own connections. Try with tiny weak.
#3
Android I can choose to use. Somehow I'm bound to M$ to earn a living and I'm not intersted to give the slightest bit of my work to a alien company.
#4
Android tries not to use my comp to distribute there own faulty bugfixes
#5
Android does not deal with private owners like beta testers for the business useres
#6
Android does not spam to force me into a new faulty version
#7
And as otheres have pointed out Android is not closed source. I can freely choose other versions doing mostly the same.