You will never know. Part of such
requests is that one is not allowed to talk about. They do a big show for some thing and the rest you will not be noticed. It's in MS own interest (or it's owners, for that) to deliver provide data. Skype was a encrypted PTP once. MS bought it and now its encryptet peer to server, iow the server can and will read it. Any reason to set up a server like that? You know it needs money to change the code, it needs money to run the server ... sounds not very revenue friendly? After that skype client on Android could not longer be turned off, reads location data without need ...
>I never said that. What I said was that Microsoft continually rejects government requests for data without a warrant. Google, Apple, and other companies do the same things.
>
>
>>You shoulds cry. If you argue that MS would never ever spy on governemnts order and you that as a fact, you know nothing. I'm realy to lazy to figure out the US law for you, I'm fine with knowing the pure fact.
>>
>>And again distraction instead of argument. Ad nauseam. You are unable to follow an argument. It becomes boring.
>>I've just pointed out that your law allows such things. No argument that EU is not doing the same. Educated people know that all our law is subordinate(?) to the right of the US and the UK to spy on us. This is because a countrys law is allways subordinate to international treaties. Even if the mainstream media imagines an other picture.
Words are given to man to enable him to conceal his true feelings.
Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord
Weeks of programming can save you hours of planning.
OffThere is no place like [::1]