Funny, but dodging the question, as I did not question the fact that GMail mails texts are scanned by Google.
Question is: Is MS having changed policies to a state allowing them to scan emails usings their services still "better" in your opinion than Google in the specific context of sending mail through their servers/having a mail account with them ? If so, why?
>Here you go
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xCj6X4LoV0. Ironically, it's hosted on a Google site. And just to be somewhat complete.
http://www.consumereagle.com/2014/04/23/google-admits-scanning-users-email/>
>
>>>>2. MS snoop by admission of their own privacy policies and EULA as well as by 3rd party investigation and observation.
>>>
>>>Show me where I said Microsoft does not collect data about us?
>>
>>You probably have never stated that. But I remember a post where you used email handling to "prove" that MS was better than Google, because MS would not scan the email text (for advertizing). Too lazy too search for it, but my guess is you will not deny that.
>>
>>As MS has now changed the privacy statement in a way that allows MS to scan the email text if one uses MS services,the previous claim of Google being more odious - at least in this specific instance - is not true any more, hence my wording that MS donned a darker hat is true. I never claimed that MS is worse than Google aka MS wears now a hat more black than Google.
>>
>>>>3. I did not see anyone denying that Google or Apple snoop. This is an attempt to deflect the light off the MS-specific-point that someone in this thread brought up.
>>>
>>>Neither did I. But I did see many people complain that Microsoft does, yet never complained that Google does. THAT is my point.
>>
>>Since I describe some of the hoops I jump through to escape Google able to pinpoint my actions, such a complain is clearly included. But there is the difference that I paid for a specific version of windows and from that I expect to decide if and when the product is changed.
