>So, VFPX is the only open source product you use? Is there a requirement that you give back to the project to use it?

You know what an example is?

>Google has you. Period.

What not mean MS needs me too. :)

>Data is yours. OS belongs to Microsoft. They don't know you're any different than the grandma down the street.

If MS reads my data and log the keys I press I doubt this. You know what big data can do?

>>Yes,
>>
>>and I participate as on VFPX or here or I donate.
>>
>>Or for Google I accept that the vendor is using my input in some form. But then I'm carefull what I do.
>>
>>To close the circle.
>>I can limit the stuff I run through google. That's an easy.
>>I can not limit the part that I do on the MS machine because this is the dev machine. And any data I do there do not belong to MS. Not a single bit. Because this is my property.
>>And the way MS acts is not thrustworthy. They can claim privacy as long as they like. I do not belive a 14k + words document. A We do not collect anything does not work? Then it is a outhright lie. As simple as that.
>>I would not thrust any customer acting like that. If the BGB is not enough, something is wrong. (In germany anything not specified in a contract will fall back to the BGB. This is normaly the solution for a hand shake contract. All on a honorable level. To specify discretion, salaries, timelines etc is normal. But legal twist of 14k words. Payment in advance and double the price. At least.)