Viv & Craig,

now you see why I am unsure as to whether or not I can use it.

My personal company does not make more than US$1M annually (assuming the money discussed is US of course). I have no idea what the turnover of the company who owns the source code is and I really doubt they'd let me know.

:(


>The converse of the below example would be where the contracting company is NOT an 'enterprise organisation' - in which case it would imply that CE could be used ?
>
>But your right - don't know about complex but it's certainly not clear :-{
>
>>That's not how a Microsoft employee explained it to me. The way I read this, if you are a contractor, then you probably cannot use Community Edition. As usual, Microsoft licensing is way too complex.
>>
>>>Not sure - seems it may depend on the basis on which the software is supplied ? Snip from the link I posted:
>>>
>>>"Example 2: A Fortune 500 firm has outsourced the development of its store-locator mobile application to a small agency. The application is not an open source project. The agency has 5 employees working on the project and would like to use Visual Studio Community 2013. Since the agency is a contractor developing this application for the Fortune 500 firm, and since the application is not an open source project, the agency cannot use Visual Studio Community 2013 for developing and testing the application. "
>>>
>>>>His company. Who you supply it to has no bearing on this license.
>>>>
>>>>>Hmm. Not sure who the 'Organisation' would be - Frank's company or the company he is supplying to.