>>>>>>>comments can be misleading: untested
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>function MyTest( cCol1Name ) {
>>>>>>>var MyObject = .... object is created
>>>>>>>var Row = MyObject[0].cCol1Name;
>>>>>>>var Col1Val = Row[cCol1Name]
>>>>>>>// var Col1Val = eval( "Row." + cCol1Name)
>>>>>>>}
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>>The commented eval() should work as well, but is considered by some to be an anti-pattern. Was a bit short in my explanation ;-)
>>>>
>>>>I am very much a newbie to javascript. So I will look up this function; use, upside and downside. One thing I found so far is that javascript is very unforgiving. If I have ANYTHING wrong in my javacript (like, e.g., missing the ending ";") nothing works in the code. And no error appears when I am running it in ASP.NET. I have to be extra careful.
>>>
>>>Just to throw one more option at you:
>>>Take a look at Typescript. It's compiles to javascript and is very good at catching errors at that point. Also allows you to define type-safe classes in a C# fashion...
>>
>>Thank you. I will Google for "Typescript".
>
>It's a MS add-on for Visual Studio. Easy to get started since it can use your existing .js files - just rename them to .ts. That in itself won't do much but, for example, you can then specify the type for javascript variables and it will enforce type safety.

I see. Thank you.