>>I am writing a quote to a large company that needs a multi-site license of my software. Basically, if this goes through, they will use the software at different facilities. There will just ONE server and ONE database. Each table of the database has a column SITE_NO so that users of each facility can add/edit/view only their records. I think in some of the technical speaks they use the term "sandboxed" indicating separation of the data by a site. The managers I am dealing with are not very computer technical. Can I still use the term "sandboxed" or is there a better way to describe how the data will be separated by a facility?
>
>Your model is also the same as my hosting site infrastructure. Only one directory, one IIS site, one application and one database serve the entire product. However, each site has its own domain. They can maintain it by filtered information known as NoSite, which is the same as the field you opted for.
>
>Yes, terminology would vary from various POV. I never gave a terminology for it. However, in the contract, it has to clearly state the client does not own anything but their subset of data.
Thank you.
"The creative process is nothing but a series of crises." Isaac Bashevis Singer
"My experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better, they don't know anything at all." Oscar Wilde
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." W.Somerset Maugham
