>Thanks. However, in the "OS" section there are now 2 instances of "Windows Server 2012", you'll probably want to get rid of one of them.

I removed the new one.

>Also for improved appearance and ease of use it would be nice to order the entries in that section. I'd recommend (from top to bottom):
>
>- Desktop OS versions, most recent at top
>- Then server OS versions, most recent at top

Thanks, I will see about it.

>I was also thinking of differentiating between obsolete and current versions e.g.
>
>- Current Desktop
>- Current Server
>- Obsolete Desktop
>- Obsolete Server
>
>but even now that's not an obvious split, Server 2003/2003 R2 and Windows XP are obsolete/no longer supported, but still widely used.

Yes, I would probably keep it as is.