>>>Please provide one piece of documented evidence that the administration "lied". Remember, to accuse Bush and related leaders that they were lying, you have to prove that they knew there weren't WMDs, but still told the country that they existed.
>
>LOL. How come you don't apply this same logic when you accuse Obama of lying?

We've been over this before. Even a long-time forum member (whom you have generally respected) jumped in and agreed with me 2 years ago on this.

In between all of Barack Obama's "you can keep your plan, you can keep your doctor" promises, he acknowledged during a C-SPAN covered health care summit that somewhere between 5 to 9 million Americans would lose their plans. He justified his statement during the summit by saying those individuals would get better plans. The number wound up being higher. Yes, some wound up being better off....for someone it didn't make much difference....and some wound up worse off.

So I've applied the criteria here

Now, some other five-star whoppers of lies:

- the administration explaining away the Benghazi attack on the same kind of spontaneous demonstrations that occurred at the same time in Cairo - when there's now hard documented evidence they knew it was the same Al-Q affiliate that had been responsible for roughly 40 acts of violence in Libya in the 9 months leading up to 9/11/2012.

- the recent claims by the administration about those who have been released from Gitmo being "low level". Obama has made specious claims about Gitmo for years now - but his statements following the Bergdahl situation last year cross over into pure dishonesty. If you want to read an outstanding piece that's backed with evidence (and written by someone who understands the difference between false statements and dishonesty), read this:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/lying-about-gitmo/article/2000276