>>Yep - Hillary thinks that women who claim that they have been sexually assaulted should be believed and listened to - unless, of course, they were assaulted by her husband.
>>That is what I am saying.

So what you meant was

Yep - Hillary thinks that women who claim that they have been sexually assaulted should be believed and listened to - unless, of course, they were accusing her husband of assault.

As for what Hilary says today: perhaps her morality has changed along with the rest of society. E.g. do you know when it became illegal to rape your wife in all US states?

Try 1993.

When Social mores change, it can be positive. E.g. the current Pope has allowed absolution for abortion and has made noises about contraception/breeding like rabbits. I suppose you could attack the Catholic Church for inconsistency or for past policies, or you could praise the new enlightenment, or I suppose you could be disgruntled because everybody knows the Pope is even worse than Hillary. ;-)

Seriously, I do get what you're saying and had not appreciated the extent of the smoke in Clinton's presence, especially knowing the reluctance a young woman and her normal family would have felt in the 1970s or 1980s to confront the powerful. Those poor women were less equipped to cope than many of today's charmers who blog about watching porn as avidly as their menfolk, exhibiting more casual familiarity with human anatomy and what fits where than used to be expected of the oldest profession. Ironically surveys show that many of today's kids agree with Clinton's definition of what is or is not sex, with certain acts seen as a casual effort of no particular meaning apart from the expectation of reciprocation.