>A prg class is usefull when you want to write as "flat text" your code,want to say you dont have to
>have visual class (vcx+vct) to carry or to download.
>In a blog you write prg's easily and dont have to download other files....(having a stored space on the
>web... even for free...)
>
>What i can say: nor the vfp9 class browser , and nor the vfpX browserX class solve safely the conversion of a
>class with multi containers.the user must re work manually the prg delivred to make it working.
>
>i tried as test with vfpScrollbar container class (SPS site).i Solve it with many changes in the code rendered by
>the class browser.
>for a complex class it is a tedious operation.
>
>Infortunatly,at this time vfp9 dont solve entirely and finely this problem.

AFAIK nobody has ever written a fully working vcx to prg converter. Personally I have never missed one, I prefer vcx over prg since I find them so much easier to work with. Especially this is true if you use some of the power tools that comes with Thor, like GoToDefinition and GoFish. Having said that, I respect your different opinion.