It's the question what to test. Valid URL or existence of a connection?
Valid URL is a pain.
http://user:password@fee.foo:1234/path/file?ask=not#Target0Is perfectly valid syntax for a URL...
localhostis valid
http://[::1]is valid
https:/127.0.0.1is valid
https://shop.heise.de/sonstiges/../.is valid.
We have umlaut domains right now - and one would expect that the input box will recieve öüä and translate them accordingly. (Even I think it's a fail)
One can just get the URL, do (in a second field or on every use) the translations one need to deal with umlaut etc. And try if one need it if one can reach the host.
Syntax check will not solve the problem of moving targets. :)
>Since a website can be down at the moment and they are frequently changed, I wouldn't include a check for the presence of the URL in a validation function.
>
>>Doesn't seem to work reliably.
>>
>>I tried invalid URL first, then valid URL, then
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/161738.com (invalid) and it didn't give me any message.
>>
>>>
>>>local m.url,m.Result
>>>m.url="https://www.levelextreme.com/ViewPageGenericLogin.aspx"
>>>
>>>DECLARE INTEGER InternetCheckConnection IN wininet STRING lpszUrl, INTEGER dwFlags, INTEGER dwReserved
>>>#DEFINE FLAG_ICC_FORCE_CONNECTION 1
>>>
>>>LOCAL llResult
>>>m.lResult = (InternetCheckConnection(m.URL, FLAG_ICC_FORCE_CONNECTION, 0) = 1)
>>>if m.lResult=.t.
>>>messagebox("Valid URL",0+32+4096,'',1000)
>>>else
>>>messagebox("inValid URL",0+32+4096,'',1000)
>>>endi
>>>
>>>
>>>see also this:http://www.sourcecodester.com/tutorials/c/7296/url-validation-using-c.html
>>>if you can translate to vfp (regExp)
Words are given to man to enable him to conceal his true feelings.
Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord
Weeks of programming can save you hours of planning.
OffThere is no place like [::1]