>Not really interested in the rehearsed taunts. Have you thought it through? You're insisting that Obama said you can flout the ACA's effect by taking on a new plan that does not comply and then keep it forever. Your version is that Obama promised that the Act actually has no effect on policies, and that the whole grandfathering complexity is a nit because people can do as they please.
>
>No. In real life and with sensible context, he was saying that the ACA's introduction would not force you to lose a plan you already had and liked. It's simply too silly to insist Obama said you could flout his act at will forever, and then call him a liar. That's a tower of silliness built on a desperate incredible interpretation of a President reassuring people happy with their current plans that the upcoming ACA is not going to stomp on them.



I can't force you (or anyone) to think in a certain way.

But I can say that the Washington Post, Politifact, USA Today, WSJ, Barney Frank (a Democrat), and a large number of American voters concluded that he lied. If you're right, that means an awful lot of "towers of silliness". :)