Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Stay classy
Message
De
24/02/2016 09:59:55
 
 
À
24/02/2016 09:07:55
Information générale
Forum:
News
Catégorie:
Politiques
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
01631878
Message ID:
01631960
Vues:
61
>He didn't mention the Supreme Court or anyone by name. He said "appointing judges." Aside from that, in the context of the current dispute, where the Republicans in the Senate are claiming he doesn't have the right to appoint them any more, I think it's a perfectly reasonable comment.
>

Tamar,

First, we all know what he was referring to. The smug little smirk that he gave after he made his joke was tasteless. Imagine if a right-wing radio broadcaster made a joke about any aftermath of the deaths of Michael Brown or Trayvon Martin....

Second, I don't believe anyone in the Senate has said Obama doesn't have the right (he certainly has a constitutional right, as well as an obligation, to make a nomination). If they did indeed use those words (that he doesn't have the right), they are incorrect.

There have been political statements by McConnell and Cruz (and others) about whether a president in such a lame duck status *should* be nominating someone. That is different than having a "right"....though regardless, I disagree with McConnell/Cruz.

Having said that, the president and many Democrats are wrong on the responsibilities of the Senate. The Senate has no constitutional obligation to take an up-and-down vote. The Senate is free to decide whether to consider a president's judicial nomination.

(My personal opinion - if the President indeed nominates someone, I do think the Senate "should" consider it and take a vote....but let's be clear, the Senate has no constitutional obligation to consider any nomination from Obama)

One final point...Democrats have recently been saying, "Obama was elected for four years...which means he can make nominations at any point in the four years".. That's certainly true. What's also true is that Democrats really go overboard in trying to protect the president from criticism during an election year. I remember Democrats saying in fall of 2012 (in response to Benghazi)..."we will find out what happened in Benghazi....but AFTER the election". The hypocrisy there is huge. They can't have it both ways.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform