>>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-clinton-email-investigation-justice-department-grants-immunity-to-former-state-department-staffer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html?tid=sm_tw
>
>
>This one is (likely) bad news for her.
>
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clinton-on-her-private-server-wrote-104-emails-the-government-says-are-classified/2016/03/05/11e2ee06-dbd6-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html?postshare=881457231008412&tid=ss_tw

Though it still seems to leave open the question of whether anything was (or should have been) classified when it was sent or received. The quotes from career diplomats surprised at some of the classifications are interesting.

Tamar