>who want to pay a bit less than with Oracle.
>
>Ok but then wouldn't they just use PostgreSQL - it's almost a direct match for most things. Oracle does have many special functions not in PostgreSQL.
They could but it might be an issue of support. Suppose some company says "Our business is in Database X, we need support from a Fortune 500 company". I'm pretty sure PG doesn't meet that. What is the largest/best established paid support option for PG?
Regards. Al
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov
"Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right." -- Isaac Asimov
Neither a despot, nor a doormat, be
Every app wants to be a database app when it grows up