>>Sanders is campaigning on substantive policy positions, and Trump is largely campaigning on the force of his personality.
>> Sanders is a career politician; Trump isn’t.
>
>Substantive policy positions? Right now Hillary is showing restraint for not calling out Sanders for completely unworkable plans.

..although in case you've missed it, she's now stealing his platform on many things - like college education for example. And I wasn't talking about HRC and Sanders - it was Sanders and Trump.

>Some of Sander's economic positions show (in part) that he doesn't even have a basic understanding of secured vs non-secured loans.
>
>"I voted against Iraq" is not a policy position.
>
>Sanders is a career politician, but it's hard to make an argument that he's very good at it. Elizabeth Warren has been a senator for less time and has a longer list of achievements.
>
>Sanders might be an OK guy but he's terrible as a candidate. HRC is 100 times more intelligent. The fact that HRC is struggling to put him away in the race tells you volumes about how bad she is.

Sanders (who doesn't have a superpac) has lots of accomplishments. You can see his record on govtrack.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357

..and you should take a look here too...
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/bernie-gets-it-done-sanders-record-pushing-through-major-reforms-will-surprise-you

Trump on the other hand - there is nothing to examine because he has no track record to look at. Which is kinda nuts if you want to be a president of the USA.

. Elizabeth Warren would make a great running mate for Sanders though.