>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix7lQLplA_E&feature=youtu.be
>
>Garland's past record on 2nd amendment rights are troubling - and even more troubling is his record of backing the EPA. EPA has done the unthinkable - they've passed the IRS in terms of corruption.
>
>(Somewhat humorous that the political left is all up in arms about Garland's position on Gitmo detainees...probably the only thing I agree with Garland on)
>
>But even beyond that - Obama before picked both Kagan and Sotomayor over Garland.
>
>Now, Sotomayor is a highly intelligent and capable judge. I don't agree with some of her decisions, but she's proven herself more than worthy.
>
>However, Kagan has demonstrated the last few years that she's nearly incompetent. Her statements during oral arguments the last few years clearly show that she doesn't know the difference between a legal statute and a government regulation/mandate/order. She's an embarrassment to the court. And yet Obama picked Kagan over Garland?
>
>It is clear that Obama's pick was a throw-away pick - the Senate should just vote Garland down and let's start this over in January.

As Mitch points out, those points, right or wrong, aren't as important as what the NRA says.

It's pretty clear that one of the pre-conditions for leadership in the Republican party is an IQ below that of the average high school dropout.
Mitch meets the standard with ease and has room to spare.
This man sets a new low for political savvy.
These people are practically sending Hillary an engraved invitation to the White House.

ix7lQLplA_E