>>Would you please give this foreigner the difference between pundit and scientist? The translation for the first we use only in an ancient context.
>
>pundit != scientist, at least as I used it
>
>In today's US parlance and pundit is someone who is paid a lot of money to talk about something.
>In general there is a negative correlation between the amount of money paid and the amount of valuable information conveyed.

O.K. that's what I have understand from the context (To be ment as slight insult). I've just get curious beause you put it here.