>>You simplify.
It's not that is not partial true, get me right.
Possibly nobody will give them a job as well? Because of known problems? Starting by language? You know what the term positive feedback means, in cybernetics? That is what happens. There are exceptions, but this is known as distourbance. If I do not trust a memember of the given group the job to clear my car window - how do they feel there place in our society is - will there reaction proove my assumptions?

OK, I'll play the role of Devil's Advocate thrust upon me. ;-)

First, you're saying that this is the first wave of refugees that couldn't speak the host nation's language and/or experienced prejudice?

Second, the scenarios you post *may* provide an explanation- but how does that help, and why wouldn't you seek to validate before excusing?

FWIW, check out the behavior of refugees from Cambodia or Viet Nam and explain the difference... ;-)

>>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/01/03/armed-militia-bundy-brothers-take-over-federal-building-in-rural-oregon/

Yes but that's in the US where they're all mad. ;-) How about Belgium? E.g. how come Belgium has the most citizens off fighting for Isis? If it's because Belgium is more prejudiced than everybody else then you Europeans should be ashamed and the UN should put in inspectors to help BBs (Belgian Bigots) mend their ways. Alternatively, people might take a step back for a dispassionate survey in case a penny of prevention might be worth a pound of cure.