>>>I'm still waiting to hear the names of the US officials who have said that these people have a legitimate excuse for mass murder.
>
>It's a soundbite allowing easy answers to complex questions while matching a familiar prejudice. Perhaps it's true because people feel it's true and want it to be true and even if you show it's not true, that's because you're a socialist appeaser and it's still true.
>
>From the citation: Muslims make up 5% of the population in Belgium but consume 40-60% of the welfare budget. IMHO the proposition is easy enough to investigate without writing off the whole article because of its style or something Satanobama is claimed to have said. If this is true, then taxpayers are entitled to be alarmed at the suggestion that some choose not to work so as not to contribute financially to a kaffir nation. That's harder to quantify but it's a reasonable question to ask.

That's a reasonable question and merits a reasonable discussion.

My issue with this thread is that the topic of the original article was not terrorists (whatever that word means.)
It did not attack terrorists - it attacked what people allegedly said about terrorists.
I have some pretty far-left friends. The suggestion that any of them would condone or excuse the killing of innocent people is insulting and absurd.
That divisive hate spewing seems to find welcome resting places, I'm sad to see.