>So much for the community if it didn't develop a mechanism to deal with such individuals. So instead of building the community's resistance against that, you'd prefer to have the state intervene, or at least know everything about it. Actually everything about everyone, in case someone turns out to be an egocentric individual.

So whats the communities resistance to organised crime and terrorism supposed to look like.

>
>>Imagine someone invented a personal force field. You are invulnerable, thats your right. Terrorists and criminals naturally would love such a thing. Should the state be able to crack the force field or does your right to personal invulnerability outweigh that ?
>
>I just love the way these questions get framed... so whatever one answers is somehow wrong, but the frame itself is beyond questioning. My answer to the choice between totalitarian state and criminals/terrorists is a no, thanks.

How do you get that. Its a yes or no. The individuals right over the group or not.