>>>
>>>A few restaurants and shops have tried such discrimination here, although it's not legal. Most of them, if not all, are no longer in business.
>>
>>Curious - because of loss of business (fewer people going to the restaurants), or because of unlawful threats and acts of fraud? That has become a key question.
>
>The first few days there usually was some kind of protests, like people handing out fliers outside their building. But after a few days people simply stopped buying from them, except for a few followers. We don't have the same tradition of using threats as you have.

And that is the risk the business takes. If the business engages in conduct that results in people lawfully declining to visit that business, it's the business' fault.