>
>Got a cite of victims actually making the claim? I haven't seen any such, only politicians claiming that victims are making that claim.


Here's the strongest statistic of all, and I mentioned it last week - one of the advocates of an earlier version of the Charlotte bill (the early version that didn't pass) is a registered sex offender.

Chad Sevearance is the former president of the Charlotte LGBT Chamber of Commerce - he was convicted in 2000 of one count of molestation of a minor.

So it is not inaccurate to say that the early origins of what eventually became the Charlotte ordinance was tainted by a community leader who essentially was promoting his own behavior.

Men are statistically FAR more likely to be sexually violent predators than women. Candidly, I am stunned that some pro-choice people who support reproductive rights (as I generally do) are OK with creating an opportunity for future problems against women in this realm.

If you dare, here are two essays that obliterate the arguments (especially the 2nd one) of those who favor the original Charlotte bill/oppose the state bill:

http://thefederalist.com/2016/04/21/drop-the-t-from-lgbt/

http://thefederalist.com/2016/04/21/trans-bathroom-bills-prove-feminism-has-failed-my-daughter/