>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am saddened by the poor choices here. Hillary is a poor candidate and truly untrustworthy, and Trump is ultimately big-government who overestimates himself/underestimates the position. And Sanders' foreign policy position is nothing more than his repeated quote, "I opposed the Iraqi war"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What is wrong with that ? Sounds great! :-)
>>>>>>Being opposed to war is a virtue. But that (plus not being Wallstreet friendly ) is exactly why Bernie is getting cold feet from establishment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>End result; Hillary vs Trump will be the only choice to voters;
>>>>>>Rock vs Hard place - pick your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>>I recently read that of 20 leaders of "important" states who were asked, only one wanted to work with Trump, and that was Putin. Living in a country with a common border to Russia, I live in hope that the Americans make the right choice in the upcoming election.
>>>>
>>>>What would be the right choice in your opinion?
>>>
>>>More or less anyone but Trump. Someone who thinks more of what's best for all people, not only for himself and his allies.
>>
>>Too funny; no such person is in the running. Don't think there has been one like that for decades.
>>
>>I think both choices are abysmal. Is a choice between Hillary and Trump the best the US could come up with ...
>
>That's clearly how the American politics work. I guess the best candidates are smart enough NOT to become politicians.

Maybe it has more to do with how America works and not American politics works. America is such a big country in terms of population, geography, ethnic and racial groups, economic backgrounds, etc. etc. The one who is "the best candidate" for one group is "the worst" for another. So the "best candidate" is a relative term. I though Mitt Romney was very good in so many ways but the left didn't like him. So there will never be "the best candidate."