>>>So categorizing this as just "tea party groups" is inaccurate.
>>
>>Tamar, I never said that the targeting was "purely" tea party, and trying to dismiss in that manner is faulty logic. Unfortunately, you've missed the point.
>
>My response was to your indicating that the article title "pretty much says it all." The article title referred only to tea party groups. That was all I was responding to.
>
>Tamar

Actually, the title itself winds up correcting the claim of the president that there was no targeting nor corruption, and not a "smidgeon of corruption". My point stands.