>You'd also have to show that harm did, in fact, result.
>In the case of the server, that was never shown.
>Carelessness, even negligence, when no one is hurt never gets before a judge.
>
>So, from that response, shall I infer that you believe that HRC did nothing wrong?

She's done lots wrong.
However, the email server issue never had a serious chance of getting before a judge.