>>First, it is royally clear that the DNC did everything they could to pave her way to victory... she won the primaries because the DNC saw to it that she had no competition. She won the primaries because the DNC mistakes "moral imperative" with "finding the right person for the job".
It doesn't matter why the people voted for her: that they did vote for her, proves that she was not the least liked with the lowest approval rating etc etc.
Which is the point Al is making so well. She won because the voters decided she was the best. Not the worst. If you say the result is wrong, then it can only be because you and yours didn't participate. That's your fault. Especially when you seem so sure that your knowledge and understanding is better than those who did participate.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
