>>You have one party that tried so hard to promote HRC that it effectively alienated voters Time will tell if that alienation is temporary
>>And you have one party that tried hard to stop the person who won. If they see any opportunity to keep HRC from winning, AND to keep Trump from winning, don't think they won't try.
>>
>>As I said before - it's a long shot. Then again, Trump was considered a long shot over a year ago. And Sanders was behind by as many as 50 points before closing the gap.
>
>I had entertained the hope that one of the candidates might be hauled before a court of law and in a tit-for-tat-reaction the other woud be as well.
>Nowadays I classify that as wishful at this time truly unrealistic thinking...

The possible "pay for play" with the Clinton foundation has been referred by the IRS commish to one of their groups. Now, whether or not they start an actual investigation remains to be seen.

Believe me, I'd love to see both of them having to answer for themselves. We need a good third party candidate. Both major parties are broken.