>
>Let's look at what it says.
>
>Ted's people say:
>
>"we relied on her, worked with her and she was pivotal in encouraging the White House to do it."
>What does that mean?
>Can we infer that without her, her husband would have rejected it?
>So the value she added was getting his attention?

cynical part of me visualizes her Lewinskying his attention to the point he did not care to fight it....