>Time will tell on this one. IIRC, the feeling when the deal was reached was that Iran was a year away from having a nuke. If we pushed that back 5 or 10 or 15 years, that's a good thing.
>
>Iran is one of those cases with no good answers, only bad and worse. My take is that the deal is better than no deal.
>

The Iranian deal and the administration's attempts to justify it, represent some of the most blatantly dishonest political messaging I've ever seen.

At the end of the Bush years and early in the Obama years, the political right voiced serious concerns about Iran and the nuclear threat. At the time, many on the political left criticized the right for spreading FUD.

Fast forward.....the administration and the political left used the belief that Iran was so close to being a nuclear threat that the deal HAD to get done. So what happened in between???

Iran has attempted to violate the terms of the deal on multiple occasions (including intelligence from the Germans last month), and it is very unlikely that we'll see the U.S. "snap the sanctions back into place"

John Kerry himself admitted that assets unfrozen could very well be used against U.S. servicemen/efforts in neighboring countries. He admitted it.

I do not like Trump one bit - but Obama supporters are hardly on good ground to criticize what Trump would do, given the disastrous foreign policy actions by this administration.