Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Understanding Rushmore optimization
Message
De
28/07/2016 18:12:16
 
 
À
28/07/2016 16:33:30
Mike Yearwood
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01638260
Message ID:
01638907
Vues:
81
enough argument here that interest only the 2 of you, please consider switching to PM

>>>>>
>>>>>No need to be rude. If you MUST have a useless index, of course, make sure it's as small as possible. That's your argument.
>>>>>
>>>>>I know the precisely why the feature exists. It was built to improve a situation that many people believe, which is mostly a myth. If you have one deleted record in 5 million records and your queries are regularly producing small sets of records, only 1 in 5 million times and possibly never, will that deleted index help at all.
>>>>
>>>>Please reread my replies. If you find any of them rude, I promise that it wasn't intentional. My ONLY point is that you must compare with identical conditions. If you compare a steam engine with a turbo charged engine running on rocket fuel, of course you will get different results. A binary index is only one eighth in size compared to a normal index, which you don't take into consideration. That's why you compare apples to oranges.
>>>>
>>>>Also know that I never delete records, so I never use index tags on deleted(). However, that's not relevant in this argument. 'nuff said.
>>>
>>>I disagree. The comparison must be whether you use an index on deleted or not - not whether it is binary or not. If the index is used on a local machine versus over a LAN there is a performance difference again. If you construct your system properly, it is not needed.
>>
>>And this is why you are totally wrong. Using your analogy, running trains is a bad idea since they use coal and pollute the air. And all airplanes are slow since they use combustion engines and propellers.
>
>Your statement is nonsensical.
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>YMMV
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The more it makes sense for me to get rid of it. Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Any index on a binary value will generally not be very effective. I've heard some people say that an index on DELETED() is effective if you have a high number of deleted records, but never tested this myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thierry Nivelet
FoxinCloud
Give your VFP application a second life, web-based, in YOUR cloud
http://foxincloud.com/
Never explain, never complain (Queen Elizabeth II)
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform