>Regarding abortion: I agree with someone's right to choose, but there's an equal right for someone else not to have to support a choice to abort with tax dollars.
>The problem with government interfering on social issues is that saying that someone a right to do something often morphs into the government endorsing the act and even funding it.
>
>Suppose I introduced a bill saying that because guns are legal, the US government will pay for my AK47.
>Sounds insane, doesn't it?

Interesting argument!

The DNC Platform is talking about overturning the Hyde amendment in order to get federal funding for elective abortion for Medicaid recipients - despite the fact that roughly 65 to 70% of Americans oppose it.

Tim Kane initially did not support this on the platform - but now he suddenly does, In my book, he's made himself "fair game" for receiving criticism.

Right now you have 3 camps....pro-life, pro-choice, and pro-abortion. I have a big problem with #1 and #3....and right now, #3 is getting as obnoxious as #1. The president of NARAL spoke at the D convention and practically boasted about having an elective abortion. OK, that was her choice - but that is not exactly something to boast (and for the audience to cheer) about.