>>>John, John, how you do go on!
>
>I'm not the one going on creating a big ado about nothing. Nor am I interested in conspiracy theories not supported by facts.
>
>All I'm seeing here is a handful of people requesting things and not getting them. E.g. Bono wanted his concert to be broadcast to the International Space Station. Yep, HRC was right onto that. Not.
>Somebody else wanted a visa for a criminal. Didn't get it.
>A Crown Prince asked for and received a meeting to which he is entitled a) as an Heir of State, b) as head of a national Military with close ties to US military, and c) as a deputy Prime Minister. Perhaps compare to a meeting request from Prince Charles who is "just" a Crown Prince and not in charge of the national Military or a Cabinet Member. Would he be allowed a meeting, whether he donated to the Clinton Foundation or not?
>
You're avoiding the 800 lb elephant in the room
Why did he give the money, John?


So, what's your point?
Lack of evidence?
Lack of prosecution?
In political cases they mean nothing.
Two (2) attorneys general, John Mitchell and Richard Kleindienst, plead to felonies in connection with the Watergate case.
Both were in charge of the FBI when the FBI conducted "extensive" investigations and found nothing.
Two cub reporters on the Washington Post found things that hundreds of trained FBI agents missed- intentionally, as it later turned out.
Something obviously stinks here, John.
If we're lucky, we'll get the facts after she's elected.
We'll have dodged the Donald and we can impeach her and be rid of the Clintons forever.