>No interest in reading anything by anyone associated by Breitbart (which is essentially a front for white nationalists);I wouldn't read a book by David Duke, either).
>
>What evidence do you have for this?

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/04/28/breitbartcom-becoming-media-arm-alt-right

> I realize that you have no interest in reading anything that is not left wing. Although I am a libertarian, I have actually read the Huffington post just out of curiosity. IMHO, being exposed to opposing points of view help to challenge me.

You are, of course, wrong. I do read centrist and right-wing POVs. But there's a difference between say, the National Review or the WSJ, and Breitbart or Drudge.

>
>In other words, the guy made it up to make money and smear the Clintons.
>
>Have they sued him for libel yet?

When you're a public figure, proving libel or slander is extremely hard, and attempting to do so just gives the slandered more publicity. While Trump is in the habit of suing left and right (especially those who claim he doesn't have as much money as he wants us to believe), it appears the Clintons don't.

Tamar