>>The MSM has been allowing the right to tar the Clintons for 30 years.
>
>The moment that I realized that Mrs Clinton was tarred was when I pulled apart the facts on her spectacular Cattle Futures profits.
>
>Amazing stuff.
>
>Starting with $1,000 she traded it up to $100,000 in ten months.
>Then she stopped trading.
>Would any sane person stop trading after they made that kind of money in real trading?
>Really??
>
>She would call it very old news at this point.
>
>The proper name for it is "Money Laundering"
>
>It is a simple laundering technique that was possible under the old rules.
>
>The broker places two trades in opposite directions for the same dollar amount.
>At the end of the day, he closes the trades and assigns the winner to Mrs. Clinton and the loser to somebody else.
>
>This is not theoretical:
>Her broker "Red" Bone had his license suspended for this exact behavior.
>
>Washington Times, April 3, 1994:
> "Bone’s sharp practices had led the Chicago Mercantile Exchange to accuse him
> of allocating trades to investors after determining the winners and losers, a practice known as “straddling.”
> Bone was punished by having his license to trade pulled for one year."
>
>It really doesn't matter that she says to forget about.
>It really doesn't matter that the press lost interest.
>None of that makes her any more innocent than O.J. Simpson.
>
>Somebody paid her $100,000
>We don't know who.
>We don't know why.
>
>We do know
>She got away with it.
>
>If you want to look the other way, go ahead, nobody can stop you.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_cattle_futures_controversy

If someone had wanted to pay her $100K, there are a lot easier ways to do it than money laundering.
Based on what I see here, she was trying to make a fast buck and enlisted the help of shady people (she was attracted by them- she married one)