>In 2008, Hillary Clinton was rightly slammed for her campaign being poorly run. By contrast, Obama's was "no drama." This year, Hillary's campaign is running smoothly with few hiccups, but Trump's is a mess. If the campaign is about evaluating leadership potential, the contrast is pretty clear.
>
>Are you implying that whoever runs the best campaign is best qualified to be president? This is what it sounds like to me...

No, I'm not. But if part of your self-described qualification for the office is your leadership experience and quality, then the inability to run a good campaign is a campaign issue.

Tamar