>In 2008, Hillary Clinton was rightly slammed for her campaign being poorly run. By contrast, Obama's was "no drama." This year, Hillary's campaign is running smoothly with few hiccups, but Trump's is a mess. If the campaign is about evaluating leadership potential, the contrast is pretty clear.
>
>Are you implying that whoever runs the best campaign is best qualified to be president? This is what it sounds like to me...

Trump keep saying he is going to get the best people, great people etc etc over and over, so the fact that he has this problem is more significant that it would be for others. If has access to all these supposedly terrific people, then why does he end up with a bunch of bozo's running his campaign? Although I admit that a big part of the problem is that he is simply a damn idiot. Can you imagine having a job where you have to sit there and attempt to defend some of the stuff he says? eeek. Even so, you listen to some of these people he has on staff in interviews and it's just an insane thing to see, they have their facts so wrong I've seen newscasters/interviewers just baffled at the ridiculous things that they say. Meanwhile every speech Trump gives he's always saying how he's gonna get the beeeest people...greeeeat people...terrrrrifffic people. ..ya know because he vocabulary doesn't seem to exceed that of a 2nd grader. I am looking forward to the debates between him and HRC. Trump didn't have to talk policy in the GOP debates, all he had to do was hurl insults. What's he going to do in one with HRC? Moderator will ask how would you deal with current situation in Turkey - HRC will give answer, Trump will say Hillary is crooked. She is too smart for him to compete with.