>I suggest that you learn more about the guy before you jump to such a conclusion. You can't hardly determine if he was really repentant (which he of course was) by one quote from one interview.
>
>As I have said repeatedly, I am not a Trump fan. For me it is a case of "Never Hillary". However, do you think that the same rules should be applied to him? Benefit of the doubt and all that. Or does this only apply to the left?

C'mon.
Silly question.
Of course there are 3 sets of rules.
1. Republicans can be crucified in the press for a clumsy drink of water.
2. Democrats have to be found guilty in court of law and then the press may start to notice.
(Of course, if there is better news, like Panda Babies or Harp Seals then the press won't notice the conviction)
3. Clintons can do anything and then lie to your face with impunity.

Oy, you were being rhetorical.
You already know the three rules, but did you already know the Panda Babies exception?

PS. The libertarian guy actually makes at least some sense, so of course he rates below rescued kittens in the news cycle...
How did we end up with a choice between a clown and criminal?