>>>She says it was not a payoff, so case closed - without investigation.
>>>Got it.
>
>Actually information about HRC's trades is readily available and has been "investigated" repeatedly, which is where your calculated odds came from. It doesn't prove wrongdoing no matter how many times people pore over it. The only way to prove guilt now, is if somebody fesses up. IMHO to formally investigate in the absence of a whistle blower can only reach one conclusion and actually shields HRC because of the "double jeopardy" principle. Sorry but in the absence of a whistle blower, an investigation now would be vexatious political posturing.

The only way to prove guilt in a court of law, yes.

To strongly appear quite guilty and never be exonerated, yes, that is where we are.
Just as innocent as OJ

Not convicted != Not guilty