>
>Similarly, all this confusion over the last week or so on what the Trump immigration policy is is a sign of a disordered campaign. Well-run campaigns have policies and put them on their websites. There might be tweaks, but everyone in the campaign knows the basic policy.
>

You mean like Tim Kaine and the DNC platform regarding the Hyde Amendment? :)

Or the conflicting messaging regarding their support for BLM?

Or the constant re-messaging on her mishandling of classified information and her false statements about turning over work-related documents?

Or their lack of specifics of what they'll do to handle the current problems with ACA? (Note: There's a limit to how many times Chelsea can pull the "my mom will issue executive orders" ) :)

Or HRC removing the famous "you have the right to be believed" message (on her website) to survivors of sexual assault (or was that a tweak???) That seemed to coincide with Juanita Broderick turning up the heat.


FWIW, independent political analysts generally view HRC's campaign as poorly run. Trump's is certainly a train wreck. There's hardly any negative statement about him that I won't agree with. But none of it makes HRC's good.
Even though I don't like Obama as a President, he is a much more effective campaigner - which is why he defeated her. And an avowed socialist managed to make HRC sweat, even with the DNC muscle trying to fix it for HRC.

And finally - here's the latest gem on HRC's unfavorable rating.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-clintons-unfavorable-ratings-hit-a-record-high/