>>> HRC, despite her issues (which are no where near as bad as Trumps)
>
>Did Trump ever vote to start a war that killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people?
>Name any ten things that Trump did that match outright slaughter.

No - because he didn't have a chance to vote on it - duh because he wasn't an elected official as he has 100% zero political experience.. HOWEVER if you do some research you'll find that he was all for the war BEFORE the war - it wasn't until after the war that he (along with everyone else) came out against it - And furthermore these votes were cast after everyone was lied to by Bush administration. Trump keeps referencing the Esquire magazine interview he did claiming he as against the war - which of course is dumb because it came out months and months AFTER the war. Now you watch Trump in interviews prior to the war - he says he's all for it. Another example of b.s. people fall for.


>>> has experience that at least makes able to perform the functions of the job, whereas Trump has no such experience at all.
>
>What experience did Obama have?

You mean besides community organizer, civil-rights lawyer, being elected to the Illinois State Senate in 1996 and to the U.S. Senate in 2004.?? It's a rather substantial amount of political experience. I do not understand why people seem to have this notion he didn't have any.Just look into it for like 20 seconds and you'll see a vast amount of experience.

>Finally.. if you had a teenage daughter, would you leave her alone in a room with Bill Clinton?

Bill Clinton is not running for president.

>She's happy being married to that low-life - that her choice-, but do you really want that degenerate back in the White House?

...If you don't want a womanizer in the White House, then picking the guy with multiple failed marriages to Russian supermodel trophy-wifes he trades in for a younger model every few years seems REALLY REALLY stupid, especially considering the fact that they guy you're complaining about isn't even running for office - and Trump is. There is no logic to your argument here.