>>No people are entitled to their own POV - no matter how ridiculous it is. I was simply pointing out the ridiculousness of Trump being qualified to lead the USA, whereas HRC, despite her issues (which are no where near as bad as Trumps) has experience that at least makes able to perform the functions of the job, whereas Trump has no such experience at all. Like I said - lesser or two evils.
>
>There's "experience" and there's "good experience". I would make the argument that HRC does not learn from her mistakes.
>
>I would ask someone to read the FBI notes from their interview with HRC, and then come back and maintain that she is a model of competence.
>
>In Colin Powell's recent (hacked) emails, which he has generally authenticated/acknowledged, he makes statements about HRC that I think are spot-on. Here were 2 big ones:
>
>"I would rather not have to vote for her..."
>"Everything HRC touches she kind of screws up with hubris. "

These are all very good and valid points Kevin. But this doesn't change the fact that Trump is basically and idiot when it comes to politics and international relations. The world (..and that includes the USA) is a safer place with HRC running the show here vs Trump. Would it be even better if it was someone else all together (like Bernie?) - ya probably - but we don't have that option. I stand by my HRC is obviously the lesser of two evils comment.